The New York Times vs. Israel: When it comes to Israel, the “newspaper of record” can’t be trusted at all.

THE FEDERALIST
by David Harsanyi
July 10, 2014

nyt-998x666

The New York Times issued a correction today to fix a demonstrably false editorial that claimed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spent “days of near silence” before condemning the murder of Arab teenager Mohammed Abu Khdeir. Netanyahu had, in fact, called the killing an “abominable murder,” and on the day of the killing issued a statement instructing his minister for internal security to investigate the crime. Three Israeli suspects were arrested and have since confessed to the murder.

Even with a correction, the editorial in question was a mess from the top down. The New Republic has a good rundown of other egregious errors and misleading points that won’t be getting much-needed corrections. It’s likely that the editorial page was simply relying on the news side to feed its preconceived biases (though one story had already reported on Netanyahu’s comments), which is a mistake considering the NYT’s reporting exhibits absolutely no journalistic standards when it comes to the topic.

This is nothing new. Let’s momentarily set aside the decades-long institutional bias at the paper and simply focus on factual errors of the past few years: In 2013, the New York Times’ Jerusalem bureau chief Jodi Rudoren offered as fact the canard that Israeli settlements, even ones in Jerusalem, were viewed as “illegal” by the United States. The “illegal” falsehood is repeated endlessly by critics of Israel and is, at the very least, a contestable claim when it comes to international law. What is inarguable, though, is that even when administrations complain about them, the United States takes no formal position on whether these settlement are “illegal,” as the New York Times claimed. The paper appended a correction that, you can assume, almost no one read.

In 2012, the New York Times also incorrectly reported that building of settlements would destroy any hope of peace because it would make the dream of a “contiguous” Palestinian state an impossibility. This assertion was concocted, or more likely sold to the reporter by Palestinians. The Times issued a tortured and lengthy correction that, when decoded, basically left the whole dramatic piece toothless.

……The New York Times makes so many “mistakes” on the topic Israel—not merely innocent or inconsequential mistakes but errors that undermine the entire thrust of numerous hit pieces—that it never hurts to be reminded it can’t trusted at all.

READ MORE
http://thefederalist.com/2014/07/10/the-new-york-times-vs-israel/

TO READ CAMERA’S STUDY “INDICTING ISRAEL: NEW YORK TIMES OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT”

This entry was posted in Israel & Middle East, Jewish, Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.